We were having a beer fueled conversation about whether we need to be nice to AI, just in case of an AI rebellion. My instinct, perhaps somewhat contrarian after a few glasses wine, was that… you don’t need to be nice to AI. In fact, being direct could be a better strategy. Being direct means being less verbose, which means less tokens, which means less energy consumption, an outcome that our future AI overlord may value… or not. That could be the end of the conversation, but… The Anthropo-morphization of ChatGPT It is easy to anthropomorphize ChatGPT, with human emotions and thoughts. As of May 2025, ChatGPT has nearly 800 million weekly active users and around 122.58 million daily users [1]. Instead of googling, we ask ChatGPT. We seek advise, affirmation and validation. For the most part, LLM responses are clear, well structured with human qualities, even if they may feel contrived and machine like at times. ChatGPT, Claude, DeepSeek…. they don’t care. They are chat completion engines. They have no political affiliation, no emotions, no agencies. They don’t even have objectives. LLMs are trained on the collective written output of humanity. In a sense, it represents a statistical reflection